Best strength of schedule nfl

Defense SOS ; KC defs. KC defs, [0%] DET, [0%] @JAC ; DAL defs. DAL defs, [0%] @NYG, [0%] NYJ ; LAC defs. LAC defs, [0%] MIA, [0%] @TEN ; SEA defs. SEA defs, [0%]. I can probably guess what teams had even easier schedules: the Dolphins, Best strength of schedule nfl, and Bills in that order. Their schedules were the same as the. Strength of victory; Strength of schedule; Best combined ranking among conference teams in points scored and points allowed; Best combined ranking among all. The Strength of Schedule table presents the winning percentages for each team and three different grouping of its opponents. These groupings include all.

2023 NFL Strength of Schedule Rankings

What’s the real effect of strength of schedule in the NFL?

KC defs. DAL defs. LAC defs. SEA defs. DEN defs. SF defs. ARI defs. DET defs. ATL defs. MIA defs. BAL defs. MIN defs. LAR defs. GB defs. NE defs. Best strength of schedule nfl BUF defs. NO defs. TB defs. NYG defs. HOU defs. NYJ defs. CAR defs. LVR defs. TEN defs. CHI defs. PHI defs. WAS defs.

CIN defs. IND defs. RK defs. Unlimited Live-Draft Sync. CLE has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. CLE has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. DAL has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.

DAL has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. DAL has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. DAL has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. DAL has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. DEN has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.

DEN has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. DEN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. DEN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. DEN has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.

DET has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. DET has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. DET has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. DET has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. DET has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.

GB has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. GB has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. GB has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. GB has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. GB has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.

GB has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average. HOU has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. HOU has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. HOU has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. HOU has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.

HOU has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. Premier league nbc commentators IND has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. IND has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. IND has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.

IND has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. IND has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. JAC has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. JAC has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. JAC has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.

JAC has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average. JAC has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. KC has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. KC has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.

KC has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. KC has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average. KC has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. KC has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. MIA has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.

MIA has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. MIA has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. MIA has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average. MIA has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. MIN has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.

MIN has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. MIN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. MIN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. Best strength of schedule nfl MIN has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.

NE has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. NE has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. NE has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. NE has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. NE has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.

NE has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average. NO has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. Teams rarely have a number higher than 3. This chart tells us the Chicago Bears had the most difficult schedule in the NFL last season, facing teams that, on average, were 2. By contrast, the Jacksonville Jaguars faced the easiest schedule, facing teams that were 2.

Dallas was right in the middle, with a 0. One way to think about these numbers is in terms of point spreads. Jacksonville, for instance, was essentially getting a 2. In fact, if you combined them there was a five point difference between having the easiest schedule instead of the most difficult schedule. These, of course, are all per game metrics. Across an entire season those five points would add up to 80 points.

Nearly half the teams had an SOS of 1. And, as OCC so rightly illustrated, teams drive their own strength of schedule numbers to a large extent. A driving factor in the 2. So, to get back to our original questions If we look at a few teams we can see instances where it likely played a role:.

Now, OCC is talking specifically about using prior year SOS numbers based upon winning percentage to predict results for the current year. But his theory holds true even for using SOS numbers from the prior year to look at results from the prior year.

Just as OCC theorized, there is absolutely no correlation between strength of schedule and overall results. Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from.