Either team to score 3 unanswered times meaning

"Goal minutes" is where it is possible to bet on the sum of the minutes when the goals have been scored. When settling such bets, goals scored in injury time of. In the event a game is halted after the minimum time has been played, and not completed within 48 hours of the scheduled start date and time, the score when the. Three unanswered scores in game: One team either team to score 3 unanswered times meaning three times with the other scoring zero points during that time frame. For example, if the Bengals open the. Sorry, but unless a sportscaster misspoke, this hasn't happened. I think you either misheard or misunderstood a broadcast. Unanswered points.

Who are the NRL’s biggest front runners? An analysis of unanswered points scored

What does it mean when a team wins either half? When you place a bet on a team to win either half, the full time result is irrelevant. The requirement for a winning bet is that the team you have bet on score more goals than their opponent in one of the two 45 minute periods in a football match.

How often does a team score 3 unanswered times? 3 scores in a row by the same team happens in almost 2/3rds of games. The math is almost right.

What is it called when a team doesn't score? In team sports, a shutout (US) or clean sheet (UK) is a game in which the losing team scores zero points. While possible in most major sports, they are highly improbable in some sports, such as basketball.

What does 3 way no push mean? A 3-way no push bet is a bet where you can bet on a win, loss, or draw, and there's no opportunity to simply earn back the amount of money you put into the bet. These types of bets typically come with a higher payout, as they can be risky to engage in because there's no security option.

What does scoring unanswered points mean? : scored in succession during a period in which an opponent fails to score.

What is the meaning of teams to score? What Does Both Teams to Score Mean in Betting? Both teams to score is a type of bet where the punters predict if opposing teams will score at least one goal or not. As a result, the outcome of the match doesn't matter as long as both teams score at least one goal.

What is an unanswered touchdown? It means that the team hasn't came back with an answer so if one team scores a touchdown, and the other team on the drive after that doesn't score any points.

What is a 3 unanswered score bet? The proposition “Will either team score 3 unanswered times in the game?” refers to a team scoring 3 consecutive times during the game, without the other team scoring in between. This only includes Touchdown, Field Goal or Safety. Any extra point after a touchdown or 2 point conversions are not included.

What does only one team to score in both halves mean? Instead, 'To Score In Both Halves' solely focuses on the selected team adding to the scoreline either side of half time. To be precise, this means that the team in question must score at least once in the first half and then again in the second half. The number of goals is irrelevant.

What does both teams to score and either team to win mean? It means that each team will score at least once during the game. The market is settled at the end of the game. Any game that ends at 1-1 or higher is a win for this market. There are three outcomes in this bet: both teams score, either of the team scores or none of the team scores.

Similarly, I hate it when some place sells "large" and "medium" sodas If there are two cups, the bigger one is large and the other is small -- regardless of the size. Medium is a comparative measure -- it doesn't stand alone. When we were in high school, the local theater was upselling sodas as a matter of policy. So if you ordered a medium, they would be required to say "Would you like a large for a quarter more?

So we made it a practice of ALWAYS ordering a smaller size than we wanted and making them make the upsell, then go for it. Only a quarter. What a deal. I can't say no!!. Yeah, kind of why Americans in general are a bunch of fat asses It is all about the bang for the buck!

Check the headline to the Fresno St. We have a local pizza place that does that, small, large and extra large. Order a large pizza and you get, effectively, a medium. Total BS. It actually does seem large to me. Until I drove an Excursion Soup has gotta point - we need all these big SUVs to carry around our fat families. Can a family of five fit in an Explorer?

Hell no, that is too 'small'. I agree with Detlef on this one. Either team to score 3 unanswered times meaning Sorry Darin. I see the point about the small-large but no medium thing, but to me Starbucks is worse with its "Tall" which is really small, "Grande" which is medium, and "Venti" which means "twenty" and is the large.

Is there anything more gay than some monster truck aficionado ordering a "Double venti mocha latte with room". So, what's the threshold. That's "seven unanswered points" by your definition. Of course, you could, in fact, answer by scoring a TD of your own. Much the same way I could "answer" a longer run of yours with a score. Which would mean your longer run of points, was not, in fact, "unanswered".

In reality only 4 are allowed in the NCAA or 5 are allowed in the NBA - the next one is not allowed and the consequence is that you will have fouled out. I think you have to finish the game without allowing the other team to score. For example, a headline may read, "The Huddle scored 21 unanswered points and won going away ". I guess any more than one score, as low as 2 FGs.

I guess the implication of the term is to point at the failure of the opposition to score at all during that period that they were conceding at least two scores of whatever kind. The expedition is large and the excursion exta large, I get it Oh, and equally surprising, Menudo hasn't interjected anything glowing about our beloved steeeeelers. Well, that's a sticky one.

One could look at it this way: You are allowed to foul 5 times in the NCAA but after having committed the 5th foul, you are removed from the game, thus preventing the possibility of committing a 6th foul. Actually, that's BS logic and you're right. That would be the same as saying you're allowed to steal a car but then will be sent to prison so as not to allow you to steal another one.

Elliott puts together some tremendous interviews and stories for the site, which has a very affordable premium subscription. Independant rugby league content needs your support. Getting back to the suggestion, it did get my brain spinning. Just how many points were teams scoring unanswered last season and this season?

Are teams with a lead continuing to pile on the points as they did in . And just how far removed from reality was . Are teams behind on the scoreboard able to claw back a deficit better than they have been. The typical game in has The only other season it trails is where The average margin at the end of a game this season after eleven rounds is now That sounds bad, but the average margin is one of the lowest up until around the 65 th minute where the scores become more one sided.

The game is still a much closer and more engaging product than it was in , which is incredibly important for a sport that relies so heavily on television revenue. There are some really interesting things to note here. The first is that has an average of 8. Teams trailing are also scoring the second highest amount of unanswered points at 4. Rugby league is healing. More proof that the games are closer and that the rule change this season has had the desired effect in rollin g back last seasons one sided beatdowns.

The numbers need to be clarified here and exist somewhat as an outlier. The first half of included the great penalty crackdown, which resulted in a significantly higher amount of penalty goals being attempted. This naturally brings down the number of unanswered points being scored and is why the average for leading teams is just 7.

The next thing that is abundantly clear is that and to a lesser extent were completely ridiculous seasons, with an extra unanswered point per run in and a whopping Trailing sides in scored at one of the lowest rates 4. Keep your hands to yourself. It wouldn't be looked at that way. Duke would be credited for scoring seven unanswered points in the x half.

Once that series of unanswered points ends, the series is over and is only referred to as something that happened earlier. The series is not diminished by one because it no longer exists as a series. It's the same as saying that Duke led by five points after x minutes into the game. You don't diminish the five because that lead was cut in later minutes.

It is a fact that Duke led by five at one time in the game. A few minutes later Duke may have led by only three points, but the fact remains that Duke led by five after x minutes. I know that some people object to the phrase "point in time", but statements regarding a series of unanswered points or amount of points in the lead are only facts about what was true at a particular point in time.

You don't go back and readjust the facts because something else has transpired. I don't see the "but". I don't know what you mean by the endpoint, but if it is total number of unanswered points, of course you mention it. Colts draft picks this year You can hardly describe the feat without providing that number.

You don't ever say "ESU scored unanswered points". That doesn't mean anything. A single basket before the opposition scores is an unanswered point. It's the series that is mentionable. Look, I know you understand this, and that you know that I understand this. You're attempting to make it more complicated than it is.

Too bad about the Stanford women, BTW. I started to look at Google results, and the ones I looked at were about cases where the other team did not come back to score in the quarter or half or match mentioned. Looking again, I can find other types of results, though they may be more rare.

The usage still strikes me as odd when, even after the match, you would count all three goals as "unanswered" even if the other team scored immediately after the third one. The "but" is that it doesn't always mean "as of now". Sometimes it means "before the other team scored". I mean that you can talk about a string that's no longer "unanswered" if you give an explicit or implicit?

If Wassamata just scored, you wouldn't say "ESU has scored 15 unanswered points", but you might say "ESU had scored 15 unanswered points before that basket. Tell me about it. If the opponents score three in a row, do they now have three unanswered points, or are their points still counting as answers to some of the previous seven?

That is to say, do they have to have answered all seven before they can start having unanswered points of their own. Or are the first six of the seven-point streak doomed to remain forever unanswered no matter what the opposition does. And are there stats for all the points left unanswered at the end of the season?

I can understand that it seems odd to you, but I hope you understand that the scoring of unanswered points has no bearing on the game because the points were scored this way. Noting that there was a series of points scored unanswered is only an observation of the temporary dominance of one team. A made free throw is one point, a made basket from outside of the 3-point line is three points, and all other made baskets are two points.

My example above uses five 2-point baskets. I'm sure there are exceptions, but I don't expect to see a reference to unanswered points scored in some sports. The only aspect of the opponent's streak that relates to the first streak is that first point scored that ended the first streak. The points are not answered individually in any case.

The streak, when answered, has ended. Either team to score 3 unanswered times meaning It no longer exists other than as part of some record keeping and the total score. Try to understand that the streak is what is being described, not the individual points. Probably, but of the streaks and not the individual points. People keep all sorts of records. None of them are particularly important except the final score.

You do cricket. A newspaper account of a cricket game may state that the bowler struck out. If the tenth batter got a hit, the statement that nine batters in a row were struck out remains true. If the 11th batter also gets a hit, you don't reduce the nine batters to eight. There might be stats kept on the number of batters a particular bowler struck out, or even stats on the number of batters in a row the bowler struck out, but they are of importance only as pub trivia.

Unless you're in a tournament, in which case things like points allowed, points scored, and average point differential may be officially used as tie-breakers for seeding in later rounds. One of my son's baseball teams recently got down to, I think, the fourth tie-breaker for seeding into the second round of a tournament.

I can't see streaks being a useful as opposed to interesting statistic, but all sorts of statistics are important for making coaching decisions and, therefore, to the players. Is that just a simplification for explanatory purposes or do you really consider free throws to be "baskets". I think I've always had them as a separate category and considered "basket" to be equivalent to "field goal", which might be worth two or three points depending on where it was shot from.

This thread started with "unanswered goals", not "unanswered points". What did you imagine they were talking about if not hockey. Baseball is different because of the way the teams take turns batting. Even I know that. Formally correct. The Laws of Cricket speak of batsmen, and until recently there was no other term used in the game.

Apart from things like 'pillock', but those were different. Purists will be upset, but the term used by Tony has now crept into the players' vocabularies. My impression is that it has come to England by way of Australian or South African cricket. I've never really thought about it, but - yes - I consider a free throw to be a "basket".

The score is counted along with the two-pointers and three-pointers. They are listed separately in the stats, but only for informational purposes. It certainly wouldn't surprise me, or cause me to think about what was said, if the play-by-play announcer would say "Jones has made six baskets; two free throws and four field goals.

However, I think he is more likely to say "Jones has scored 10 points including two free throws". Basketball has changed so much since I was in high school and college in Indiana. It startled me. It's rarely called anymore. Do they still call double-dribble. Players seem to take the ball from one end of the court to the other with three touches of the ball to the hardwood and get away dribble-hold-dribble all the time.

I would not describe them as "field goals", but then I don't really hear that term used very much.